HomeNixon FoundationNixon Center

Fish Wrap Would Be A Step Up

December 15, 2008 by Robert Nedelkoff | Filed Under American Politics, Barack Obama, Internet, Media, News media, U.S. History 

Russ Smith is a Baltimore resident and occasional contributor to the Wall Street Journal. But once upon a time he was quite a potent figure in the world of “alt-weeklies,” founding the Baltimore City Paper in 1977 and a Washington counterpart four years later.  Upon selling these journals later in the 1980s for $4 million, he founded the New York Press in 1988.  It took the Press a while to effectively mount a conservative challenge to the Village Voice – complete with an insert edited by legendary right-leaning playboy Taki – but when it hit its stride, it forced the Voice, in 1996, to switch to free distribution to compete.

But by the early days of the millenium, Smith had a good inkling of what was to come, and sold the Press in 2002.  Six years later he set up a website, Splice Today, where this month he formally pronounces the death of the American newspaper.

Smith’s column – or post, to use the new-media term – is quite worth reading.  He begins by summoning up a scene from the recesses of memory: he and his parents and brothers, assembled around the breakfast table in the early 1960s, plowing through one New York and Long Island daily after another.  The Times, Post, Herald Tribune, News, World-Telegram & Sun, Journal-American, Newsday, even the Mirror – all were there for the reading.  Smith lovingly describes his father’s periodic observation that one need read no more than the opening and closing paragraphs of James Reston’s Times column to know what he had to say.

(in fact, as one who sometimes read Reston’s column can attest, often the opening and closing sentences sufficed for that.  This did not stop President Lyndon B. Johnson from agonizing, day in and day out, over every single word of the column where it concerned his administration.  For a modern-day equivalent, younger readers should try to picture President Obama fretting over the morning’s dailykos.com.)

Smith goes on to describe the family pawing over the sports news, the funnies, the editorial and entertainment pages, until it was time to go to school or work.  And then he notes that his businessmen brothers, lifelong newspaper readers, no longer bother to even glance at the Wall Street Journal more often than a couple of days a week.

Tellingly, he observes that when Celia Farber, noted for her 25-year crusade against HIV as the cause of AIDS, learned that her writing on the subject had been ridiculed in a New York Times article, she complained to a friend who worked for the paper, who replied that he saw no reason for her to fret because the Times was “just fish wrap.”  But Smith is kind enough, when quoting Ms. Farber’s statement that her father let his subscription to the Times lapse a few years ago, not to identify the gentleman by name.  To realize that Barry Farber – one of the most famous figures in talk radio in the ’70s and ’80s (and still on the air today) and occasional candidate for Mayor of New York and the House of Representatives – no longer bothers with the Times is to realize how far the paper’s fallen.

Smith concludes by recounting a $5 bet he recently made that the Times will be sold by the end of next year, if some billionaire has the wit to offer the stockholders a share price well above the $7 or so it trades for now. He thinks $30 a share could wrest the paper from the Sulzburger clan; I would guess that as little as $22 would suffice.  But would anybody in New York want to bother?  In Los Angeles, where Tinseltown moguls still believe with childlike faith that to own a newspaper is to control a city’s or state’s political life, rumors are again circulating that David Geffen may buy the LA Times from its bankrupt owners.  But a more realistic view probably prevails at the other end of the country.



Comments

One Response to “Fish Wrap Would Be A Step Up”

  1. Maarja Krusten on December 16th, 2008 9:06 am

    Have you ever see a commentary on the potential impact that increasingly fewer hard copy newspapers will have on senior citizens? Not all of them use computers. I know some elderly people who, on Sundays when the weather is bad, spend much of the day reading several Sunday newspapers (The Washington Post, the New York Times, the Washington Times) that are delivered to the doors — well, front yards — of their homes. Losing the ability to do that would be a real loss, especially to those who are uncomfortable with the notion of computers and who prefer to get their news in written form rather than aurally and visually (TV).

    When I see people write about newspapers (as Richard Cohen does in his “Piercing the Bubble” about Obama in WaPo today, many who choose to comment dismissively say that they read newspapers only on their electronic devices. There’s a “so what if newspapers die” quality to their comments, similar to what I saw on the Post’s site when the classical FM radio station WGMS went under recently in the DC area.

    I sometimes shake my head over the self-centered “I’m ok — so what if others aren’t” quality tone to many of the comments posed on articles about obsolete media. They seem oblivious to the needs of the elderly, some of whom never have used or touched a computer or Blackberry (and never download music or listen to satellite radio).

    Previous advances in technology didn’t seem to have such a strong impact. My elderly mother still owns a LP turntable (bought within the last 10 or so years to replace an older one), a cassette player and a CD player. She can play music off of media that is as much as 50 years old (some of her old records). As long as hardware continues to be made that plays legacy media, she’ll be ok. The impact of the PC and Internet is much more jarring to the news dissemination business than the development of new means or listening to music.

    And there are implications for historians in the way that media become unusable in ways that never affected printed items. I still can search the Haldeman Diaries on CD because I kept one of my old computers which has the driver required for that. Unfortunately, when Sony released the CD in 1994, it set it up so that some introductory video images run before you reach the table of contents. Most modern-day computers freeze up before you get to the TOC, locking you out of the Diaries because they lack the old QuickTime driver for which the program on the CD searches in order to play the introduction. I’ve seen academic libraries state that they own the Haldeman Diaries CD but no equipment on which it will play. The Miller Center also referred to that problem on its website. Yet a 14-year old product is not that old. It’s a shame that the CD can be used by fewer and fewer people, given the fact that it includes much more from the Diary than the printed book.

    Archivists’ and records managers’ listservs have a lot of discussion about the shelf life of newer media. Many people use CDs or flash drives or SD cards or mini-SD cards to store information. But anything you put on CDs and such like needs to be copied periodically because CDs don’t have a long projected life. They are not as good a preservation medium as microfilm.

    I’ve rambled on long enough this rainy morning in DC but the Fish Wrap story got me thinking about seniors and how technological change affects their lives and how quickly media become obsolete.

    Maarja

Got something to say?