http://thenewnixon.org/2009/07/01/dummies-and-dummier/ Sat, 19 May 2012 15:00:45 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 http://thenewnixon.org/2009/07/01/dummies-and-dummier/comment-page-1/#comment-93799 The Washington Post, Disgraced : The New Nixon: News and Commentary about the President, his Times, and his Legacy Thu, 02 Jul 2009 19:45:22 +0000 http://thenewnixon.org/?p=15691#comment-93799 [...] Newsweek: Dummies And DummierBy Frank Gannon [...] [...] Newsweek: Dummies And DummierBy Frank Gannon [...]

]]> http://thenewnixon.org/2009/07/01/dummies-and-dummier/comment-page-1/#comment-93638 John H. Taylor Thu, 02 Jul 2009 03:07:42 +0000 http://thenewnixon.org/?p=15691#comment-93638 Pretty cool, Frank! Pretty cool, Frank!

]]> http://thenewnixon.org/2009/07/01/dummies-and-dummier/comment-page-1/#comment-93501 Bob Woodward Wed, 01 Jul 2009 20:54:14 +0000 http://thenewnixon.org/?p=15691#comment-93501 Frank: That is correct. I did not write the line. I said something along the lines of: Important for what it says and what it doesn't say. I know you worked on it, and given the situation I think it is a very good memoir, full of the real Nixon. Bob Woodward Frank: That is correct. I did not write the line. I said something along the lines of: Important for what it says and what it doesn’t say. I know you worked on it, and given the situation I think it is a very good memoir, full of the real Nixon. Bob Woodward

]]> http://thenewnixon.org/2009/07/01/dummies-and-dummier/comment-page-1/#comment-93491 Todd Wed, 01 Jul 2009 20:03:22 +0000 http://thenewnixon.org/?p=15691#comment-93491 I am only 200 pages or so into the book, but to call it a "Dummies guide to evading history" isn't even ironic (it's history, from start to finish). And when one considers the volumes and volumes written *about* Nixon, but "RN" is the only book *by him* regarding his life in total (up to that point), I hope you are right that Woodward put it on the list in an un-ironic way. I am only 200 pages or so into the book, but to call it a “Dummies guide to evading history” isn’t even ironic (it’s history, from start to finish). And when one considers the volumes and volumes written *about* Nixon, but “RN” is the only book *by him* regarding his life in total (up to that point), I hope you are right that Woodward put it on the list in an un-ironic way.

]]>